New Legislation Puts Illinois on Track to Vastly Expanded Local Farm Economy

Illinois Governor Patrick Quinn recently signed landmark legislation that will put the state on the road to a vastly expanded supply of Illinois-grown food for Illinois tables.

During a ceremony held on the front lawn of the home of Department of Agriculture (located on the Illinois State Fairgrounds), Governor Quinn said the legislation represents an important first step in a process that could ultimately bring as much as $30 billion a year to the state’s economy.

[Audio of Governor Quinn signing the bill addressing the need for more locally grown foods in Illinois, plus a question & answer session after.]

“Agriculture is a diverse, multi-billion dollar industry that employs nearly one-quarter of the state’s workforce. Simply stated, agriculture is the largest industry in the state and vital to our economy,” said Governor Quinn at the “Ag Day” event. “Standing in sharp contrast is the fact that nearly 96% of the food eaten in Illinois is grown in other states or nations. The legislation I signed will stimulate the rapidly growing efforts across Illinois to grow food for local consumption. As traditional Illinois farmers, local food organizations, and others respond to demand for locally-grown food, there will be an enormous amount of new economic activity in our agricultural sector and thousands of new jobs across the state.”

The new law is designed to greatly increase demand for locally grown food by starting the process of building a reliable market for local food at facilities and institutions, like public schools, that receive significant state support. Also, the legislation establishes the Illinois Local Food, Farms, and Jobs Council, which will encourage farmers to grow food for local markets and facilitate the building of the systems needed to get it there.

The legislation caps almost two year’s effort by the Illinois Local and Organic Food and Farm Task Force to determine the potential for Illinois to grow and produce food for consumption within the state and in neighboring states. A study released by the Task Force earlier this year, Local Food, Farms & Jobs: Growing the Illinois Economy, revealed that of the approximately $48 billion spent by Illinoisans on food each year, only a tiny fraction is grown in Illinois. A set of straightforward measures to encourage Illinois farmers to grow food for local consumption, coupled with a system for processing and transporting the food to Illinois markets could bring an estimated $30 billion to the state’s economy each year.

“I believe economic development begins in the kitchen.”

“I believe economic development begins in the kitchen,” said Illinois Agriculture Director Tom Jennings. “There is no question we can produce locally grown fruits, nuts, and vegetables. We also have the processing and packaging capabilities right here in our own backyard. Setting up a distribution system that moves items at reasonable cost from tree or vine to the table is the big challenge and this legislation is an important step toward realizing that goal.”

“This legislation is the first step in creating a fresh farm and food system in Illinois that will bring important benefits to every corner of our state,” said Representative Julie Hamos (D-Evanston), lead sponsor of the bill in the House of Representatives. “As Illinoisans meet the increased demand for fresh food grown within the state, every community’s economy will see the benefits. New jobs will be created as the system to process and transport the food to local markets is developed. Those who live in Illinois and in adjacent states will benefit from the increased supply of fresh, locally-produced food.”

Representative Hamos said that one result of the expanded local food system will be the growth of rural communities through expanded numbers of small and mid-size farmers and larger numbers of people working in agriculture.

“The fact that all but a tiny percentage of the fruits, vegetables, and meats that Illinoisans eat are produced in other states or countries is an astonishing imbalance and presents us with an enormous opportunity.”

“The fact that all but a tiny percentage of the fruits, vegetables, and meats that Illinoisans eat are produced in other states or countries is an astonishing imbalance and presents us with an enormous opportunity,” said the State Senate via Senator Jacqueline Collins (D-Chicago), Senate sponsor of the bill.”This legislation is an important step forward that will enable farmers in the state to produce and sell fresh food in underserved communities.”

Key elements of the legislation include:

  • Formation of the Illinois Local Food, Farms, and Jobs Council, which will work with state agencies, Illinois businesses, organizations, and citizens to build a fully functioning local farm and food system in the state.
  • Establishment of local food procurement goals for state agencies such as prisons and other places where the state provides food service to purchase 20% of their food locally by 2020. State-funded institutions such as schools and mental health centers would have a goal of 10% by 2020. The Council would work with the organizations and agencies to develop strategies for local purchasing.
  • Creation of a local food purchase preference for state-owned food buyers in which they could pay a premium of up to 10% above the lowest bid in order to purchase locally grown goods.
  • Implementation of a system for gathering baseline data about local food purchases that would be updated annually.
  • Development of a new Illinois label and certification program to support farmers and businesses who want to be part of an Illinois-based farm and food economy.

    “This legislation opens the door to a vast expansion of the local farm and food networks in Illinois’ already world-renowned agricultural infrastructure. It encourages Illinois farmers to respond directly to consumers’ demand for fresh, tasty, locally-produced foods, and shows how to do it,” said Wes Jarrell, chairman of the 32-member task force. Jarrell is Professor of Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resources at the University of Illinois, and a farmer himself.

    “We don’t have to ship in all our fresh food from warm regions when the weather is cold.”

    Jarrell noted that food production in Illinois has become a year-round industry as farmers and others adopt techniques for growing food in the winter months as well as the traditional growing seasons. “We don’t have to ship in all our fresh food from warm regions when the weather is cold,” he said, “and with a much greater diversity of cold-season fruits and vegetables, eating what’s locally in season isn’t nearly as boring as it used to be.”

    Key findings from the task force report that led to the new legislation include:

  • The market for local food is growing. The number of farmers markets in Illinois grew from 97 in 1999 to 270 in 2008. The number of community-supported agriculture organizations, which allow consumers to “subscribe” to a variety of Illinois-grown food products throughout the season, grew from 14 to 68 in the past eight years.
  • Demand extends into wholesale markets as well. Illinois colleges and universities, as well as corporate kitchens, schools, hospitals, prisons, restaurants, and grocery stores want to buy farm products from nearby sources. Inadequate local food production and delivery channels pinch supply. Illinois’ predominant farm and food systems is designed to serve distant markets, not link farm production with in-state markets.
  • Local food system development is a nationwide phenomenon. Many states are taking steps to satisfy consumer demand to know how food is produced, where, and by whom. State government’s role is to help jumpstart j
    ob creation, lending, and investment in the local food system so that entrepreneurs can grow the economy. By participating in this effort, Illinois is helping to create a new form of interstate commerce.

    The legislation (HB3990: Illinois Food, Farms, and Jobs Act of 2009), the report of the Illinois Local and Organic Food and Farm Task Force, and other information is available at www.foodfarmsjobs.org.

    This is amazing legislation, and I’m eager to see what changes Illinois can put into place. One question: Who is creating such a bill in Missouri, and if the answer is no one, how can we band together to do so ourselves?

  • In Which My Love For Anthony Bourdain Grows Even More

    The latest Feedbag podcast features Josh Ozersky chating with Anthony Bourdain about the New York Wine & Food Festival, fried chicken, hyper-localism, mixology, and why tasting menus are like guitar solos:

    USDA to Define “Natural” in the Labeling of Meat and Poultry Products

    The United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced that it will solicit further public comment as the USDA seeks to define the conditions under which it would permit the voluntary claim “natural” to be used in the labeling of meat and poultry products. The agency made the announcement through the publication of an “Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking” (ANPR).

    The USDA is seeking comments to clarify and resolve issues surrounding the “natural” claim, including how best to coordinate the FSIS’ regulation of “natural” claims with the Agricultural Marketing Service’s (AMS) voluntary “naturally raised” marketing claim standard.

    The current FSIS policy states that the term “natural” may be used in the labeling of meat and poultry products provided that the product does not contain any artificial flavor or flavoring, coloring ingredients, chemical preservative, or any other artificial or synthetic ingredient and that the product is not more than “minimally processed.” The current AMS policy states that “natural” means the meat must come from animals raised with no hormone growth promoters, no antibiotics, and no animal by-products.

    The USDA believes that the just-released ANPR will facilitate the emergence of consensus on the meaning of “natural” and will allow the USDA to move quickly to a proposed rule. Simply put, we should combine all of the requirements from both the FSIS and the AMS and make that the new rule.

    In October 2006, FSIS received a petition requesting that the USDA initiate rulemaking to establish a codified definition for the voluntary claim “natural” and to delineate the conditions under which the claim can be used on the labels of meat and poultry products. In December 2006, FSIS held a public meeting and requested comments on “natural” claims. FSIS received a high volume of comments that expressed divergent views on the use of the claim “natural” following the December 2006 public meeting. Therefore, FSIS is publishing an ANPR to solicit more focused comments on the issue. The ANPR requests comments on a number of issues related to the use of “natural” claims in the labeling of meat and poultry products.

    For detailed description of these issues, please refer to the ANPR. During the ANPR process, FSIS will continue to apply its current “natural” claims policy described in the FSIS Food Standards and Labeling Policy Book.

    Comments on the ANPR must be received by November 13, 2009. Comments can be sent to Docket Clerk, US Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, 5601 Sunnyside Ave, Room 2-2127, Beltsville, Md. 20705; or through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov; in the “Search for Open Regulations” box, select “Food Safety and Inspection Service” from the agency drop-down menu, and then click on “Submit.” In the Docket ID column, select “FDMS Docket Number FSIS-2006-0040A to submit” or view public comments and to view supporting and related materials available electronically.

    I’m pleased that the new USDA administration is taking on this issue, but you have to do you part too. Leave a comment for the USDA so that they can ensure that the definition of “natural” encompasses all that it should. But to always ensure that your meat is “natural,” shop at your local farmers’ markets and ask the farmer exactly how they raise their animals. I can guarantee they will be more than willing to tell you.

    I Heart The (Grass-Fed Beef) Taco

    [Sent on the Now Network from my Sprint® BlackBerry]

    I love the simple, old-school taco … ground beef seasoned with Old El Paso taco seasoning, shredded cheddar cheese, salsa … all contained in a crispy Old El Paso taco shell. I grew up eating them, and I still love to eat them today.

    After Chuck made a quick trip to the new Schnucks’ Culinaria at 9th and Olive for an Old El Paso taco kit, a red onion, two jalapenos, a bunch of cilantro, and limes, dinner was underway.

    I made the seasoned taco meat with ground beef from American Grass Fed Beef.

    Their cows are born, raised, and finished on open grass pastures in the rolling hills of southern Missouri. Their cows receive a forage diet free of pesticides as they are continually rotated to fresh new pastures, and they are never held in confinement, never fed antibiotics, and never receive synthetic growth hormones. In addition, American Grass Fed Beef practices a holistic approach to farm management that sustains and nourishes the environment through restoration and soil improvement techniques.

    What does all this mean? We had tasty—and happy—meat for dinner!

    As for the cheese, there are no bags of shredded cheddar in our house. Not only is it quick and easy to grate your own cheese, it’s also cheaper than buying it pre-shredded. Tonight’s cheese of choice? “Seriously Sharp Cheddar” from Cabot in Vermont; easily accessible and just right for old-school tacos!

    In addition to loving the taco, I also love salsa, and one of my favorites is Chuck’s simple salsa … it’s quick, fresh, and tastes great.

    Just dice a few firm, red tomatoes (ours came from the Maplewood Farmers’ Market so that may have something to do with the fresh taste!), half a medium red onion, two jalapenos, a handful of cilantro, then mix together with lime juice and salt … bright, fresh, delicious!

    Now that my tacos are beginning to digest, my mind is turning to dessert … and I believe a big ‘ole bowl of plain chocolate ice cream may be in my future!

    Help Shape The Conservation Stewardship Program

    From the folks at the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition:

    Since the 1930s, we’ve been paying farmers to produce corn, wheat, rice, and cotton. What if instead we paid farmers for producing healthier soil, cleaner water, climate change mitigation, and greater bio-diversity? That’s the “big idea” behind the Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP): pay farmers for producing environmental outcomes that contribute to the public good.

    Sustainable and organic farming advocates have an important—but short—opportunity to help shape the implementation of this working lands conservation program. The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) has requested comments on the administrative rules that will govern implementation of the new CSP. The deadline for submitting comments is September 28th.

    The USDA is considering giving a higher rank to CSP applications proposing the adoption of new conservation practices vs the maintenance of existing practices. Current rules give equal weight to existing and proposed conservation practices. Please tell the USDA that CSP applications should be ranked on the basis of environmental outcomes and not on the basis of when a conservation practice is implemented.

    You can submit a comment on the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition website or follow the instructions below.

    Background and Talking Points:

    The USDA has posed a specific question for comment: Should the program give greater weight and therefore a higher rank and a higher likelihood of acceptance into the program to applications proposing new conservation practices? Or should existing and new practices be given equal weight?

    The Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) and other conservation programs pay farmers for adopting new conservation practices. The CSP, however, is unique among working lands conservation programs. The CSP rewards farmers who are already farming at a high stewardship threshold and provides an incentive to maintain those high stewardship standards.

    If a farmer has previously adopted advanced conservation measures and systems, the program is designed to reward that behavior and help pay for continued active management and maintenance of those systems and practices. Farmers should also be expected to and be rewarded for adopting new practices. But CSP ranking and payments should be keyed to environmental outcomes and not on when conservation activities are adopted.

    CSP design and regulation should equally balance the benefits of both existing and new practices with the primary measure being the environmental benefits secured by the total conservation system regardless of the timing of adoption of various parts of the system. This is essential to making CSP a program that recognizes and rewards the multiple benefits of sustainable and organic farming systems.

    How to Submit a Comment:

    Comment letters can be as short or as long as you want. Put your comments in your own words, and raise the points most important to you.

    Again, you can submit a comment on the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition website, or you can e-mail comments directly to USDA at CSP2008@wdc.usda.gov.

    If you send your own e-mail, be sure to identify the Docket Number at the top of your letter (RE: NRCS-IFR-09004), address your comment letter to Mr. Gregory Johnson, Director, Financial Assistance Programs, US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Room 5237-S, Washington, DC 20250-2890, and identify yourself by providing your name and contact information. You may also mail your letter to this address if you prefer not to email it.