Activist Alert: Say No to Frankenfish and Frankenswine

From the good people at Food and Water Watch:

“There’s a race to see which will be introduced in the US first—genetically engineered pigs or salmon. The truth is, US food agencies don’t have a way to evaluate the full impacts of these GE [genetically-engineered] animals on human health or the environment. Worst of all, if these GE animals are introduced into our food system, they won’t be labeled, so consumers won’t know what they’re buying. Can you take action to keep genetically-engineered animals out of the US?

Frankenswine and Frankenfish do exist, and they are in a race to see which will be on your plate first. The Food and Drug Administration [FDA] is considering whether or not they will allow GE pigs and salmon to reach your plate. There are so many things that are wrong with this scenario that I don’t know where to begin, but the worst is that they won’t have to be labeled. We need to stop these genetically-engineered animals in their tracks.

Enviropig™ is a genetically engineered pig that was created in Canada. The creator’s idea is to make a pig perfect for factory farm environments, which will produce less polluting waste. While this is an important consideration, there are other solutions to factory farm problems, such as more diversified and local agriculture. Additionally, no testing has been done on the human health effects associated with eating this genetically engineered pork.

On the genetically-engineered salmon front, the aquaculture industry is trying to make a fish that grows at twice the normal rate, so they can get it to market sooner and make more money. This poses many environmental and human health threats. What will happen if these living genetically-engineered animals escape and breed with non-GE animals? And most importantly, what happens to us if we eat genetically-engineered animals? The answer is, we simply don’t know—and it’s not worth the risk to allow either of these animals to reach our plates.

The FDA doesn’t require any special testing or approval for genetically-engineered animals. They also don’t have to consider any environmental impacts. It’s up to us to demand that the FDA reject GE animals. Consumers don’t want Frankenfish and Frankenswine on their plates. Take action to keep genetically-engineered animals out of the US.

Umm, yeah, no Frankenfish or Frankenswine for me. I signed the petition. Will you?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Federal Court Rescinds USDA Approval of GE Sugar Beets

“Today Judge Jeffrey White, federal district judge for the Northern District of California, issued a ruling granting the request of plaintiffs Center for Food Safety, Organic Seed Alliance, High Mowing Organic Seeds, and the Sierra Club to rescind the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA’s) approval of genetically engineered “Roundup Ready” sugar beets.

Andrew Kimbrell, Executive Director of plaintiff and co-counsel the Center for Food Safety, stated, “This is a major victory for farmers, consumers, and the rule of law. [The] USDA has once again acted illegally and had its approval of a biotech crop rescinded. Hopefully the agency will learn that their mandate is to protect farmers, consumers, and the environment and not the bottom line of corporations such as Monsanto.”"

Click here for the full article.

Enhanced by Zemanta

GMO Alfalfa? Not On Our Watch

At first I had plans to make this a quick blog post, spending just enough time to share some information I received from the good folks over at Food Democracy that I think you need to be aware of. Then it hit me. I’ve never shared my thoughts on GMOs (genetically modified organisms, if you will) with you.

Okay, what is a GMO, you ask? A genetically modified organism (GMO) is an organism whose genetic structure has been altered by incorporating a gene that will express a desirable trait; this process is often termed “gene splicing.” Most often, the incorporated gene allows the organism to express a trait that will enhance the final product’s desirability to producers or consumers. Keeping this in mind, let’s talk tomatoes.

As we all know, tomatoes generally get softer as they ripen. This is due to a protein in the tomato that breaks down the cell walls of the aforementioned fruit, a natural process that just happens to tomatoes. However, this process was deemed undesirable by the tomato industry because soft tomatoes are difficult to transport across the country without brusing or breaking.

Enter the “Flavr Savr Tomato,” a tomato that could be left to ripen longer on the vine and still remain firm through a couple of weeks of shipping, handling, and sitting on a store shelf … and the first food produced from gene splicing. The “Flavr Savr Tomato” had a gene incorporated into its DNA to prevent the breakdown of the tomatoes’ cell walls. The result of the incorporation of this new gene was a firm ripe tomato, ready to ship to consumers across the country.

What’s so wrong with that you ask? Umm, where do I begin?

First, and probably most simply, what’s wrong with a tomato getting a little soft and ultimately going bad quickly if not consumed? As I said above, it’s a NATURAL process that occurs within the tomato. To me, this just means one needs to consume tomatoes as soon as the come off the vine; they’ll be at their freshest—and tastiest—at that time anyway. This is why I buy my tomatoes at my local farmers’ market. I know that these tomatoes were picked the day they were brought to the market and only traveled a relatively short distance to get to me. Which leads me to …

Second, genetically modified organisms pose a number of risks, both known and unknown. In a nutshell, the controversies surrounding genetically modified foods and crops typically focus on safety (to both human beings and the environment), labeling issues and consumer choice, intellectual property rights, ethics, food security, poverty reduction, and environmental stewardship. I could go deeper into each of these risks, but really, isn’t the fact that this list is so long enough to make you question the need for GMOs? Which leads me to …

The reason I started this blog post in the first place was to make you aware of an important issue in the GMO world that needs your attention now. Therefore, I present to you the following from the folks at Food Democracy:

Once again, the organic industry is under assault. Monsanto is eager to resume the marketing and sale of their Roundup Ready™ alfalfa.

Fortunately, the possibility that Monsanto’s Roundup Ready™ alfalfa may be deregulated by the USDA has caught the attention of two leading members of Congress: Senator Patrick Leahy and Congressman Peter DeFazio. We are joining with our partners at Center for Food Safety in encouraging members of Congress who support regulation of GMO alfalfa to sign their “Dear Colleague” letter, addressed to Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, asking him to maintain the ban on GMO alfalfa, protecting farmers, the environment and the organic industry.

If your legislator has not done so already, they have until the end of this week—48 hours —to sign this letter and join their colleagues in asking Secretary Tom Vilsack to maintain the ban on Monsanto’s genetically-modified (GMO) Roundup Ready™ alfalfa.

This past March we invited you to send in your comments to the USDA asking them to not permit GMO alfalfa to be grown, jeopardizing the organic industry. Your response was overwhelming: in a 48-hour period more than 56,000 Food Democracy Now! members responded telling Secretary Vilsack that you value organics and the livelihood of farmers over corporate profits. We need to do it again.

Can you sign a letter to your congressman telling them that you want them to tell Secretary Vilsack to stop the approval of GMO alfalfa?

As you may already know, in April of this year, the US Supreme Court heard arguments regarding the deregulation of Monsanto’s GMO alfalfa. If the Supreme Court rules in favor of Monsanto, it could spell ruin for the organic industry. While we’re still waiting for a ruling from the Supreme Court, this is no time to be passive. If remarks from Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia are any indication, we need to keep fighting. Justice Scalia’s words, regarding contamination of organic alfalfa were: “This isn’t contamination of the New York City water supply … this is not the end of the world.”

It may not be the end of the world, but it could spell the end of the organic dairy industry as well as end the export market of US organic and natural alfalfa. Studies have shown, that if approved, contamination of organic alfalfa is certain. Once contaminated, the organic dairy sector, the cornerstone of organic agriculture, stands to lose billions of dollars, while thousands of other American farmers will lose a vital market in Europe and Japan where GMO-free alfalfa is widely sought.

Will you please take a moment to sign a letter to your representative asking them to sign this letter to Secretary Vilsack? And if you really want to take part in food democracy today, take another moment to call their office, showing your strong opposition to GMO alfalfa.

This is essentially the first time that a member of Congress has shown interest in championing an issue related to anti-GMO. This is a crucial moment, and it’s vital that we make our voices heard to our representatives and senators. We are counting on you today to sign your name and make the call.

Several senators and representatives have already signed, along with numerous non-profit organizations, businesses, and companies to send a clear message to Congress saying “NO” to GMO alfalfa.

Oh, so whatever happened to the “Flavr Savr Tomato”? Turns out, this tomato didn’t taste very good and was extremely costly to produce so it shriveled on the vine. I guess we can chalk one up for the good guys.

Protecting Organic Food From GE Crops and Other Things Monsanto

I recently started following @WithoutMonsanto on Twitter.

@WithoutMonsanto’s real name is April Davila, and she writes the blog A Month Without Monsanto. April started her blog after a friend posted a link to an article in the Huffington Post, “Monsanto’s GMO Corn Linked to Organ Failure, Study Reveals,” on her Facebook page. She says that “after reading the article, my instinct to stick it to the man compelled me swear off all things Monsanto for good. How hard could it be?”

Apparently, it’s going to be quite hard because according to April almost “everything from last night’s steak, to the Cheez-Its on our desk, owe their existence to Monsanto” … and unfortunately, she’s right. April’s month without Monsanto starts March 1st … I know I’ll be tuning in. Good luck, April!

Oh, and while we’re on the topic, here’s a little something to ponder from the Food Team at Food & Water Watch:

“Many people are concerned about eating genetically engineered foods because of possible health risks. Unfortunately, the US Department of Agriculture is getting closer to approving Monsanto’s genetically engineered (GE) alfalfa, despite the fact that it’s likely to contaminate other crops, including organic alfalfa. Almost all organic dairies are dependent upon organic alfalfa, and organic standards don’t allow the use of GE crops.


The USDA has studied the possible contamination issues with this perennial crop. They admit there could be problems, but claim they don’t know if the contamination of organic alfalfa would matter to consumers of organic food. This is ridiculous, since avoiding genetically engineered ingredients is one of the biggest reasons people seek out organic foods.

We need to tell the USDA loud and clear that consumers want foods that are free from genetic engineering. Click here to tell the USDA that consumers do care, and they should reject genetically engineered alfalfa.